DrayTek UK Users' Community Forum
Help, Advice and Solutions from DrayTek Users
Single Public IP address Vigor 2955 and Vigor 120
- colins@sfia.co.uk
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
03 Dec 2010 11:07 #65125
by colins@sfia.co.uk
Single Public IP address Vigor 2955 and Vigor 120 was created by colins@sfia.co.uk
I have read on the Draytek Website that the Vigor 120 ADSL modem can pass on a single public IP address to a router that sits behind it like a Vigor 2955.
My network consultant insists that I need 2 public IP addresses to use this configuration. I only have 1 Public IP address; is it possible to use the Draytek 2955 behind an ADSL modem as I interpretted or not?
Thanks,
Colin
My network consultant insists that I need 2 public IP addresses to use this configuration. I only have 1 Public IP address; is it possible to use the Draytek 2955 behind an ADSL modem as I interpretted or not?
Thanks,
Colin
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kelvin
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 18
- Thank you received: 0
03 Dec 2010 16:44 #65128
by kelvin
Replied by kelvin on topic Single Public IP address Vigor 2955 and Vigor 120
The V120 will indeed pass on the specific IP address to the PPPoE device that sits next in line. There is no actual requirement to allocate an IP address to the V120 itself, except for configuration and monitoring uses. This could be a private address such as the default 192.168.2.1 and the ethernet interface on the PPPoE router could be 192.168.2.2. This does not affect the allocation of the external public IP address.
If you also have a routed subnet coming in with your ADSL service, the PPPoE router can distribute this to the clients behind it as it sees fit.
So, while I think the whole are can be confusing, the answer is No, you only need a single public address if the PPPoE router is going to use NAT to service its clients.
If however, you intend to run a public web server behind the router, you will also need a routed block of addresses from your ISP, UNLESS you pin port 80 on the public address to a specific NAT'd client behind the router.
Does this cover the question asked?
If you also have a routed subnet coming in with your ADSL service, the PPPoE router can distribute this to the clients behind it as it sees fit.
So, while I think the whole are can be confusing, the answer is No, you only need a single public address if the PPPoE router is going to use NAT to service its clients.
If however, you intend to run a public web server behind the router, you will also need a routed block of addresses from your ISP, UNLESS you pin port 80 on the public address to a specific NAT'd client behind the router.
Does this cover the question asked?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- colins@sfia.co.uk
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
05 Dec 2010 00:28 #65156
by colins@sfia.co.uk
Replied by colins@sfia.co.uk on topic Thank you
Yes thank you, Kelvin.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Chris, Sami
Copyright © 2024 DrayTek