DrayTek UK Users' Community Forum
Help, Advice and Solutions from DrayTek Users
Draytek 2820 to Draytek 3900 VPN.
- pinnuamark
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
09 Oct 2013 15:02 #77916
by pinnuamark
Draytek 2820 to Draytek 3900 VPN. was created by pinnuamark
Hi
I'm having a problem getting a VPN connection between a Draytek 2820 and a Draytek 3900.
Have followed the instructions on the web site to set this up and still no connection.
http://www.draytek.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=2665&Itemid=293&lang=en
Here is the flow of the connection
2820
> INTERNET
> 2800 (ADSL CONNECTION)
> 3900
> Internal network
Has IPSECPASSTHOUGH set to on the 2800
Here is what I'm getting on the syslog on the 3900.
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] meth=108, but already using method 109
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already using method 109
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] meth=107, but already usi
<13>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: g method 109
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: "SteveKay" #382386: responding to Main Mode
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: "SteveKay" #382386: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: "SteveKay" #382386: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: "SteveKay" #382386: NAT-Traversal: Result using RFC 3947 (NAT-Traversal): i am NATed
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: "SteveKay" #382386: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2
Don't understand this as I've setup countless Draytek units to either connect another Draytek or other VPN devices with no problems at all.
Can any one help please.
Regards
Mark Chambers
I'm having a problem getting a VPN connection between a Draytek 2820 and a Draytek 3900.
Have followed the instructions on the web site to set this up and still no connection.
Here is the flow of the connection
2820
> INTERNET
> 2800 (ADSL CONNECTION)
> 3900
> Internal network
Has IPSECPASSTHOUGH set to on the 2800
Here is what I'm getting on the syslog on the 3900.
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection]
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] meth=108, but already using method 109
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already using method 109
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] meth=107, but already usi
<13>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: g method 109
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: packet from ???.???.???.???:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-00]
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: "SteveKay" #382386: responding to Main Mode
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: "SteveKay" #382386: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: "SteveKay" #382386: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: "SteveKay" #382386: NAT-Traversal: Result using RFC 3947 (NAT-Traversal): i am NATed
<141>Oct 9 14:49:19 Vigor: pluto[9721]: "SteveKay" #382386: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2
Don't understand this as I've setup countless Draytek units to either connect another Draytek or other VPN devices with no problems at all.
Can any one help please.
Regards
Mark Chambers
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cifer
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 21
- Thank you received: 0
23 Oct 2013 14:06 #78051
by cifer
Replied by cifer on topic Re: Draytek 2820 to Draytek 3900 VPN.
Can i ask why you are still using a 2800 and not replacing it with Vigor 120?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Chris, Sami
Copyright © 2024 DrayTek